oioioi.programs.tests
¶
Module Contents¶
Classes¶
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Contains the contest logic and rules. |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Contains the contest logic and rules. |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
TestCase for Django Migrations |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
Functions¶
|
|
|
- class oioioi.programs.tests.SubmitFileMixin[source]¶
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestProgrammingProblemController(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestProgrammingContestController(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestProgramsViews(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.filetracker.tests.TestStreamingMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSourceWithoutContest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestHeaderLinks(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestProgramsXssViews(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.filetracker.tests.TestStreamingMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestOtherSubmissions(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestNoOtherSubmissions(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestDiffView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSubmission(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,SubmitFileMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSubmissionAdmin(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSubmittingAsAdmin(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.PrivateProgrammingContestController(contest)[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.programs.controllers.ProgrammingContestController
Contains the contest logic and rules.
This is the computerized implementation of the contest’s official rules.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSubmittingAsContestAdmin(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestSubmittingAsObserver(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestNotifications(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestScorers(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestUserOutsGenerating(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestAdminInOutDownload(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.ContestWithJudgeInfoController(contest)[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.programs.controllers.ProgrammingContestController
Contains the contest logic and rules.
This is the computerized implementation of the contest’s official rules.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestRejudge(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,SubmitFileMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- fixtures = ['test_users', 'test_contest', 'test_full_package', 'test_problem_instance', 'test_submission',...[source]¶
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestLimitsLimits(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestCompiler(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestMaxScoreMigration(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.utils.test_migrations.TestCaseMigrations
TestCase for Django Migrations
migrate_from, migrate_to should be Django migration names of tested app setUpBeforeMigration(self, apps) method will be called before migrations are applied
source: https://www.caktusgroup.com/blog/2016/02/02/writing-unit-tests-django-migrations/
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestReportDisplayTypes(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestAllowedLanguages(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,SubmitFileMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.programs.tests.TestLanguageOverrideForTest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.