oioioi.contests.tests.tests
¶
Module Contents¶
Classes¶
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Contains the contest logic and rules. |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Contains the contest logic and rules. |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Contains the contest logic and rules. |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
|
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve |
Functions¶
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestModels(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestScores(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionListOrder(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionListFilters(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestUrls(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestCurrentContest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestContestController(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestContestViews(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestMySubmissions(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestManyRounds(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestsUtilsMixin
,oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- fixtures = ['test_users', 'test_contest', 'test_full_package', 'test_problem_instance', 'test_submission',...[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestMultilingualStatements(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.filetracker.tests.TestStreamingMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.ContestWithoutStatementsController(contest)[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.programs.controllers.ProgrammingContestController
Contains the contest logic and rules.
This is the computerized implementation of the contest’s official rules.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestMySubmissionsContext(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmitButtonInProblemsList(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestStatementsVisibility(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.BrokenContestController(contest)[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.programs.controllers.ProgrammingContestController
Contains the contest logic and rules.
This is the computerized implementation of the contest’s official rules.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestRejudgeAndFailure(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestRejudgeTypesView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestContestAdmin(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAttachments(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.filetracker.tests.TestStreamingMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestRoundExtension(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.programs.tests.SubmitFileMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestPermissions(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- fixtures = ['test_users', 'test_contest', 'test_full_package', 'test_problem_instance', 'test_submission',...[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestPermissionsBasicAdmin(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- fixtures = ['test_users', 'test_permissions', 'test_contest', 'test_full_package', 'test_problem_packages',...[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestProblemsMenuWithQuizzes(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- fixtures = ['test_users', 'test_permissions', 'test_contest', 'test_quiz_problem', 'test_problem_instance',...[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionChangeKind(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestDeleteSelectedSubmissions(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmitSelectOneProblem(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmitSelectManyProblems(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestDateRegistry(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.ContestWithPublicResultsController(contest)[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.programs.controllers.ProgrammingContestController
Contains the contest logic and rules.
This is the computerized implementation of the contest’s official rules.
- separate_public_results()[source]¶
Determines if there should be two separate dates for personal results (when participants can see their scores for a given round) and public results (when round ranking is published).
Depending on the value returned, contest admins can see and modify both
Results date
andPublic results date
or only the first one.- Return type
bool
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestPublicResults(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestContestLinks(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestPersonalDataUser(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestUserInfo(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestProblemInstanceView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestReattachingProblems(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestModifyContest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestRegistrationController(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAdministeredContests(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionViewWithoutContest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionAdminWithoutContest(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
,oioioi.programs.tests.SubmitFileMixin
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- oioioi.contests.tests.tests.see_limits_on_problems_list(self, username, displays_submissions_limit, displays_tries_left, additional=[])[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionsLimitOnListView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- oioioi.contests.tests.tests.see_link_for_submission_on_problem_list(self, username, should_see)[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestSubmissionsLinksOnListView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestNoSubmissionsLimitOnListView(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAPIGetProblemId(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
rest_framework.test.APITestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAPISubmitBase(*args, **kwargs)[source]¶
Bases:
rest_framework.test.APITestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAPIContestSubmit(*args, **kwargs)[source]¶
Bases:
TestAPISubmitBase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestAPIProblemsetSubmit(*args, **kwargs)[source]¶
Bases:
TestAPISubmitBase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestManyRoundsNoEnd(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestRankingVisibility(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestContestChangeForm(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.
- oioioi.contests.tests.tests.set_registration_availability(rvc, enabled, available_from=None, available_to=None)[source]¶
- oioioi.contests.tests.tests.check_registration(self, expected_status_code, availability, available_from=None, available_to=None)[source]¶
- class oioioi.contests.tests.tests.TestOpenRegistration(methodName='runTest')[source]¶
Bases:
oioioi.base.tests.TestCase
Similar to TransactionTestCase, but use transaction.atomic() to achieve test isolation.
In most situations, TestCase should be preferred to TransactionTestCase as it allows faster execution. However, there are some situations where using TransactionTestCase might be necessary (e.g. testing some transactional behavior).
On database backends with no transaction support, TestCase behaves as TransactionTestCase.